Ending Roe Was Supposed to Reduce Abortions. It Didn’t.

  • Thread starter The New York Times
  • Start date
T

The New York Times

Guest
From the moment that Roe v. Wade was overturned, the question was just how much the change would reduce abortions across the United States. Now, more than a year later, the numbers are in.

Margot Sanger-Katz, who writes about health care for The Upshot, explains why the results are not what anyone had expected.

Guest: Margot Sanger-Katz, a domestic correspondent for The New York Times.

Background reading:


For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

Continue reading...
 

Similar threads

T
Replies
0
Views
20
The New York Times
T
T
Replies
0
Views
17
The New York Times
T
T
Replies
0
Views
21
The New York Times
T
T
Replies
0
Views
19
The New York Times
T
Back
Top